Analogue-sequencer

On Wednesday 21 January 2004 14:35, Paul Nagle wrote:
> For me the DAT comes into play here.
>
> >It's that bad, that I'm now looking around for a
> >multitracker (like the DPS16 I once owned) to make quick
> >and good recordings in 24-bit/96k without the need of
> > the PC. Switching on the thing would be a lot cheaper,
> > I know...
>
> Good idea.  My Roland VS-880 could also do the job I
> guess.

Too bad, DAT nor 880 will do the job. I really need the 
24-bit/96k format (or better). Recording analogs at 44 or 
48k would result in too much aliasing. You won't get that 
analog feel unless you go way up in the sample freq.

But I like your approach. ;)

- Robert