RE: [analogue-sequencer] another question: triggering a pattern
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
Actually, I think that it would be less confusing, but that's just the way I think... I am so used to overriding the gbar, I never even thought of that. If I always override it, I can use it for just these patterns. Now, having not used the gbar yet (intentionally...), will it work like I want to ? If I tell it step 16, will the pattern in question not repeat until it finally reaches step 16? Or will something more sinister happen?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-------------- Original message -------------- > > ok - so then it is using the temporary last step as set in > > the aux event, rather than the one at the pattern level? That > > is what seems to be happening....but I'll have to look again > > later tonight. If it looks at the aux event last step to > > determine one repeat, then it seems to me that one complete > > time through the pattern may not be reached. > > Yes.. the last step set by the aux event is treated as the last step as > far as repeats are concerned. > It would be more confusing if it wasn't, no ? > > I can see that might cause you a problem if you want a pattern to 'grow' > in length over a specified period of time... > The way to do that would be by setting a longer gbar. Ideally you'd want > a gbar per track, but then it wouldn't be a gbar ;-) > > Cheers, > Colin f > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]