RE: [analogue-sequencer] another question: triggering a pattern
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
-------------- Original message -------------- > > No - that's the whole idea. I want the pattern to reach step > > 16 for one repeat. If it counts 16 steps, then it would reset > > even earlier than setting chng = P. > > Right, I think I understand. You have a pattern that is changing length > under aux control and each time the pattern resets from it's current end > point, that counts as a playlist repeat. But you only want it to count > at step 16 ? correct. > Is the progression of the length of the pattern consistent ? If so, you > could work out how many steps it takes to reach step 16, then set gbar > to that number with chg=B. Then the gbar reset/repeat count will > co-incide with the pattern reaching 16. > Is that any help ? I'm confused. "The 'global bar length', GBar, is the number of 16th note steps that the P3 will use as the length of one cycle of the current part." So, if I set gbar to 16, won't the pattern reset well before I want it to without ever reaching step 16? Suppose it actually takes, e.g. 45 16th note steps to reach step # 16, as indicated by the cursor lighting up step 16? > If I made it work such that a pattern with a dynamically modified length > only counted a playlist repeat when the 'real' last step was reached, > you could end up having playlists getting stuck on a pattern that never > reaches step 16. > That should be the user's responsibility to make sure that his patterns do what is intended. I think that this should at least be available as an option, say, 'use pattern last step'. > However, there might be some aux events I could add that would let you > get this level of control. There is a playlist 'hold' flag, used oddly > enough for playlist hold in ple mode. If you set that 'on' on step 1, > and 'off' on step 16, the playlist would be prevented from advancing > until step 16 was reached. That seems easy enough... > Well, I only argue so strongly proportionally to how much fun I'm having with the P3. So I hope you're taking this in the right spirit. But this just seems so basic to me that part of the concept of using an aux event to control the last step is that you may want to create a much longer evolving pattern. I think that Paul's suggestion of using parts would work - I could (I think - haven't tried part aux events) tell it to move to the next part on step 16, but then, if I wanted to repeat this pattern x times, I'd need x parts... > Cheers, > Colin f > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]