Analogue-sequencer

Just my  two cents.  Put your name on it man. For better or worse (business wise) this thing is a work of love and art. It doesn't need a fancy name. Step up to the plate and let your name speak for itself. Forty five years ago when you said "i'v got a Fender" folks would just go bugs. It was more than just a name. How cool would it be to say, "I've got a Fraser"?  ....or just P3 ?..... damn cool in my book.
kind regards
john duval

-------------- Original message -------------- 
CF-3 Syquentyx...


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT






Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analogue-sequencer/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
analogue-sequencer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

darkstr1746@comcast.net wrote:
> Just my  two cents.  Put your name on it man. For better or worse
> (business wise) this thing is a work of love and art. It doesn't need
> a fancy name. Step up to the plate and let your name speak for
> itself. Forty five years ago when you said "i'v got a Fender" folks
> would just go bugs. It was more than just a name. How cool would it
> be to say, "I've got a Fraser"?  ....or just P3 ?..... damn cool in
> my book. kind regards     
> john duval

I agree with John. I think "Fraser P3" sounds very cool.

Gert
www.waveworld.tv

On Sunday 31 October 2004 02:09, Gert van Santen wrote:
> I agree with John. I think "Fraser P3" sounds very cool.

"Fraser" sounds like a good brand name, imo. The word looks 
good, imo.

Also, I wouldn't use a brand name that suggests sequencers 
in any way, Colin. I'm sure you're going to design and sell 
other non-sequencer stuff, and that brand would then work 
against it.

- Robert

Thinking about branding depends on the goals you are after Colin. You must decide that first. 

Robert van der Kamp <robnet@wxs.nl> wrote:On Sunday 31 October 2004 02:09, Gert van Santen wrote:
> I agree with John. I think "Fraser P3" sounds very cool.

"Fraser" sounds like a good brand name, imo. The word looks 
good, imo.

Also, I wouldn't use a brand name that suggests sequencers 
in any way, Colin. I'm sure you're going to design and sell 
other non-sequencer stuff, and that brand would then work 
against it.

- Robert


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/analogue-sequencer/
  
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
analogue-sequencer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



			
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.  www.yahoo.com/a

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]