End-cheek update
2005-04-26 by colinfraser_com
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:15 UTC
Thread
2005-04-26 by colinfraser_com
Folks, The walnut end-cheeks arrived, but are being returned so the factory can apply lacquer to all sides. Someone assumed the inside faces didn't need it. I've had one set finished on the inside, which you can see in the new animated gif on the group home page, and P3 web site. Cheers, Colin f
2005-04-26 by Julian
Colin, From your website: " Most recently, the Atmel AT89C51ED2 is being used, since the Temic part was discontinued. This has given another clock speed increase, and larger flash ROM." Does this meen that theres more rom to implament features? And, if so, im guessing that youll use it. And then im wondering about older macines... Julian [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-04-27 by Colin f
> From your website: > > " Most recently, the Atmel AT89C51ED2 is being used, since > the Temic part was discontinued. This has given another clock > speed increase, and larger flash ROM." > > Does this meen that theres more rom to implament features? It works out there's 1k more useable ROM space than the older CPU. > And, if so, im guessing that youll use it. I'll use it if I need to. Fortunately SDCC 2.4 (the C compiler I use to build to P3 firmware) produces noticably more efficient code than the previous version. The current P3 test build is at 469 pages of a possible 492 in the original CPU, or 500 in the newer (pages being 128 bytes). So there's plenty room for the time being. The current release build is smaller than the test build too - I'm working on a simplified playlist edit mode, and transmission of controller messages from the knobs in play mode. > And then im wondering about older macines... If it comes to the point where the code size exceeds the capacity of the older CPU, and someone wants to upgrade, I'll be happy to supply a CPU upgrade for minimal cost. Cheers, Colin f
2005-04-27 by Paul Nagle
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:58:09 -0000, "colinfraser_com"
<colin@colinfraser.com> wrote:
>I've had one set finished on the inside, which you can see in the new
>animated gif on the group home page, and P3 web site.
Very pretty - and having seen the production model in the flesh, so to
speak, I must say this baby looks as well as it performs. Trouble is
can I justify a *third* one?
8-)
Nice one man and good luck with it!
Paul
---
Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk
Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com2005-04-28 by privat_joy
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "Colin f" <colin@c...> wrote: > > > From your website: > > > > " Most recently, the Atmel AT89C51ED2 is being used, since > > the Temic part was discontinued. This has given another clock > > speed increase, and larger flash ROM." > > > > Does this meen that theres more rom to implament features? > > It works out there's 1k more useable ROM space than the older CPU. > > > And, if so, im guessing that youll use it. > > I'll use it if I need to. Fortunately SDCC 2.4 (the C compiler I use to > build to P3 firmware) produces noticably more efficient code than the > previous version. The current P3 test build is at 469 pages of a possible > 492 in the original CPU, or 500 in the newer (pages being 128 bytes). So > there's plenty room for the time being. > The current release build is smaller than the test build too - I'm working > on a simplified playlist edit mode, and transmission of controller messages > from the knobs in play mode. > > > And then im wondering about older macines... > > If it comes to the point where the code size exceeds the capacity of the > older CPU, and someone wants to upgrade, I'll be happy to supply a CPU > upgrade for minimal cost. > > Cheers, > Colin f That's more than fair! Thanks in advance... Stefan