Re:Cubase setup
2008-05-27 by p evans
Feel obliged to add my 2 pence here which is that software manufacturers and as has been said probably most computer users are loving the DAW, and one way to make that more of a strangle hold on the music industry is of course to program out any option other than computer as master. Steinberg would argue that they're embracing the future but I didn't think that meant denying the past. I'm still building my P3 (tut tut I know) which I'm hoping will mean no computer period, but one solution would be Atari! Cubase and the best timecode no doubt - excellent. Ableton would and definitely does work with midi clock quite nicely and programmed by musicians who seem to do accurate sampling and keep the clock, strange no? Anyway enough rant... Have you checked that any of your other kit can take Midi clock but can output as MTC? I had, well still have, an identical problem with using Cubase on my Apple and I seem to remember that I had my 606 as master running sync to 909 then that outputing clock to machine drum which sent MTC to Cubase - ridiculous really and all had to be dumped as syncing to 8 track tape with the Apple was a complete joke. Was easier to dump the whole lot as a midi file and whack it back into the Atari - unreal. Then have the audio tracks running in Apple synced to MTC from the Atari. Steinberg: "if not syncing correctly it's likely that your tape is running unevenly...etc etc" My Atari's response: "All looks good to me, let's rock" Sometimes it's better to have less options, tight parameters can focus creativity in a way that an unlimited palette can't. Pete.