Analogue-sequencer

you can get pretty funky with song structure as things are, imho.
and hitting 1 button to switch to the next part doesn't take all that much  
performance skills/anxiety.

On Jun 2, 2009 7:21am, "ch.³l" <MikeFrost@free4thefree.net> wrote:














> --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "sean_zoega" wrote:

> >

> > --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "seanzoega" wrote:



> ...

> I take both of your comments about the p3 not being a linear sequencer,  
> however I do feel that the V4 software is missing a vital component in  
> being able to playlist parts. (Please remember I am a novice and this is  
> my first impression). I do take on board that its not a linear sequencer  
> and is more of a performance tool...however no matter how experimental  
> your work you end up having to apply some structure to make it more  
> accessible.

> ...



> Hi Sean,



> I think the P3's remote control functions will probably give you a number  
> of the things you're looking for.

> Until recently I had 2 P3's as my only sequencers, and when sequencing a  
> track I used to record all the midi output of several performances of the  
> track to Cubase, where I'd then cut out the junk and build the track out  
> of the useful parts of the different performances.

> I've now sold 1 P3 and replaced it with an MPC 1000, which is much more  
> focussed on song-style creation instead of live performance. As a result  
> I now do all final sequencing in the MPC's song mode, from which I also  
> switch parts & mute or unmute tracks on the P3 using remote control.

> Using this method allows me to continue creating in a live performance  
> style while also giving me the ability to sequence in a song-based style.



> grtz, Chiel










> 






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]