> the phaser i like most is the > moogerfooger 12-stage phaser. > > unfortunately i don't have the ASys rs400, > but if it sounds similar to the smallstone, > than it is a good option. > the doepfer a-125 (6-stage) doesn't sound as good as > the moogerfooger, but it is the cheapest > in price, so you can buy two or more of them > for stereo processing and enhance it's sound even more. > > if money is not the problem, i would go for > the moogerfooger. Thank you very much for your answer ! I have seen price of the moogerfooger and it's a little bit pricey for me... I thing that the rs400 is a good solution. However, I read some articles on the Net and there is something not very clear for me : is a phaser the same as a comb filter ? My opinion is that a phaser is a comb filter with the delay controled by a lfo. Am I right ? Arnauld
Message
phaser vs. comb filter
2003-03-26 by Arnauld Michelizza
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.