Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000)

Assuming that the TX81Z editor is valid, it should work just fine (the
site I ripped them off from was from an artist that used it regularly,
so if there's anything wrong, it's probably with my BCR2000.)

If the WT11 can take TX81Z patches, I don't foresee any problems. 
I've got a YS200 keyboard that takes the same patches as the TX81Z,
and though I still haven't gotten my BCR2000 to work properly in this
respect, I've got a software patch editor which works fine on both the
YS200 and the TX81Z.  Yamaha is pretty good about cross-integration
with the different FM synths.  I just hope somebody gets the BCR2000
to work for this function and that it is just my particular unit
that's malfunctioning.  I don't mind buying another one, but
otherwise, FM synthesis is going to have to take a permanent leave of
absence from my studio because I'm not going to be using a computer in
there anymore.

--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Martin Klang <mars@...> wrote:
>
> 
> yes, sorry, the WT11!
> It's the tone generator I got with my second-hand wx11 electronic wind  
> instrument, and it's a little beaut.
> 
> It can load voices straight from a DX11 or TX81Z, but the WT11 has  
> extremely limited editing capabilities itself.
> Hm, reading the manual it says it is possible to edit  a performance  
> using an external MIDI device, e.g. DX11.
> 
> Now I just have to wire this up with 2 midi cables and a broken BCR  
> usb connection...
> Send preset, reconnect!
> 
> /m
> 
> On 29 Apr 2008, at 18:17, ivaasura wrote:
> 
> > --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Martin Klang <mars@> wrote:
> > Do you mean the DX11 or the WT11? The WX11 is a MIDI saxophone... ;-)
> > The DX11 should be compatible to the TX81Z, as it was it's keyboard
> > version, but I do not know the WT11's sound architecture.
> >
> > Something different: In the early nineties I once tried to program my
> > Kawai MM-16 controller for my TX81Z, I found out that there were some
> > errors in the sysex documentation of the manual. They mischanged some
> > parameters for one operator with the parameters of another...
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
>