I did some more tweaking with the BCR2000 last night. Tried every
channel, used BC Manager to mess with the SysEx a little bit, and then
for the final test, I reprogrammed it to send a mod wheel controller
to the YS200... none of the above worked. It's my BCR2000 afterall.
For some reason, it still works via USB, and I feel that I'm done
with FM synthesis for a while anyway (at least until I can find a
DX200 again), so I'm just going to sell the YS200 and get some more
analogs. Thanks a ton for the help, though!
--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, "rpcfender" <rpcfender@...> wrote:
>
> Most sysex headers have a byte to ID the manufacturer, the device and
> device ID, but it is really up to the manufacture what he/she wants to
> put in the sysex message.
>
> If you had 2 TX81z with Midi going in one and through to the other, it
> would be a good idea to be able to send sysex to one and not the other.
>
> Early sysex used the Midi channel in the device byte, then came the
> device ID, then the common channel. It is very flexible but very
> confusing .
>
> I have an old TQ5 sitting about so I dragged it out and wrote a preset
> for it.
> The sysex is the same for the TX81z but the TQ5 has a few more
> features, like a pitch envelope and some FX stuff.
>
> It should work for your TX81z on channel 1.
>
> It's in the files section - in the the preset folder under TQ5.
>
> Royce
>
>
> --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Wicked" <face_sucker@> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't realize that Yamaha's SysEx was channel dependent. (You'll
> > have to excuse me, but I'm still a newb to SysEx programming, hence
> > why I've been looking for presets instead of making my own. If these
> > were CC's or NRPN, I'd have no trouble, but SysEx just pisses me off
> > to no end.) My YS200 is set to channel 16 currently, but when I get
> > home, I can definitely give channel 10 a shot and see what happens.
> > Would the TX's recognize SysEx with the channel bytes stripped so that
> > way somebody could reprogram the TX81Z presets to be a little more
> > universal?
> >
> > Thanks a ton for your help. Thank god somebody can wrap their head
> > around SysEx. (I figured out FM synthesis, do I really need more
> > complex mathematical languages laid on me!?)
> >
> > --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, "rpcfender" <rpcfender@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The Tx81z (or TQ5 in my case) sysex parameter format
> > >
> > > $F0 sysex start
> > > $43 Yamaha
> > > $1n Sub status (TX81 types) where s = channel
> > > $12 Voice or $13 additional voice parameters
> > > value
> > > $F7
> > >
> > > If you have a look at the sysex in the preset, it is sending the 3rd
> > > byte of $1A
> > >
> > > Is your TX set up to be channel 10?
> > >
> > > > Assuming that the TX81Z editor is valid, it should work just
> fine (the
> > > > site I ripped them off from was from an artist that used it
> regularly,
> > > > so if there's anything wrong, it's probably with my BCR2000.)
> > > >
> > > > If the WT11 can take TX81Z patches, I don't foresee any problems.
> > > > I've got a YS200 keyboard that takes the same patches as the
TX81Z,
> > > > and though I still haven't gotten my BCR2000 to work properly in
> this
> > > > respect, I've got a software patch editor which works fine on
> both the
> > > > YS200 and the TX81Z. Yamaha is pretty good about
cross-integration
> > > > with the different FM synths. I just hope somebody gets the
BCR2000
> > > > to work for this function and that it is just my particular unit
> > > > that's malfunctioning. I don't mind buying another one, but
> > > > otherwise, FM synthesis is going to have to take a permanent
> leave of
> > > > absence from my studio because I'm not going to be using a
> computer in
> > > > there anymore.
> > > >
> > > > --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Martin Klang <mars@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, sorry, the WT11!
> > > > > It's the tone generator I got with my second-hand wx11
electronic
> > > wind
> > > > > instrument, and it's a little beaut.
> > > > >
> > > > > It can load voices straight from a DX11 or TX81Z, but the WT11
> has
> > > > > extremely limited editing capabilities itself.
> > > > > Hm, reading the manual it says it is possible to edit a
> > performance
> > > > > using an external MIDI device, e.g. DX11.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now I just have to wire this up with 2 midi cables and a broken
> > BCR
> > > > > usb connection...
> > > > > Send preset, reconnect!
> > > > >
> > > > > /m
> > > > >
> > > > > On 29 Apr 2008, at 18:17, ivaasura wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, Martin Klang <mars@> wrote:
> > > > > > Do you mean the DX11 or the WT11? The WX11 is a MIDI
> > > saxophone... ;-)
> > > > > > The DX11 should be compatible to the TX81Z, as it was it's
> > keyboard
> > > > > > version, but I do not know the WT11's sound architecture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Something different: In the early nineties I once tried to
> > > program my
> > > > > > Kawai MM-16 controller for my TX81Z, I found out that
there were
> > > some
> > > > > > errors in the sysex documentation of the manual. They
mischanged
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > some
> > > > > > parameters for one operator with the parameters of another...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
