I have been using Sonar since it was Cakewalk. I have a BCR2000. It is a pain. Had to program it myself in order to get bi-directional feedback using UCS. That having been said, I wouldn't leave it. The new Sonar 6 doesn't helpin making BCR2000 easy to use with their new control surface intigration. Limited control of knobs and no bidirectional feedback. But all that is probably BCR specific. It has been a very stable and easy to use program with enough features to handle whatever you throw at it.
So you may want to see if Trazport is easily intigrated with Sonar. Check the cakewalk user forum at cakewalk.com
Steve Meiers wrote:
Steve Meiers wrote:
brainztain,btw: nice nameI'm curious about your switch to Cubase from Sonar, because I'm thinking of going the other way myself and wonder what made you change over. I'm not really influenced by the BCF, I use one, but my main mixer is a DDX3216, so I have digital control over it.Basically, I noticed that Sonar seems to be getting more popular and Cubase less. I also notice the price differences, it seems that Sonar is more reasonablly priced, feature for feature, etc.And the other reason is the GNX interface, so I can drive Sonar from my GNX guitar pedalboard without having to go to the computer keyboard. As a guitarist/engineer it makes life easier.For me, using Cubase with the DDX or the BCF has been a very complex venture gettting it all configurd. I made my own paper template to help me remember the slider/know functions, too. This helps once it's all done. But the time spent getting it all working was almost not worth the results for me. I was hoping that Sonar and maybe TranzPort would be user friendlier, also coupled with the GNX for start/sop/record.Steve MWe have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups.
Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the new Yahoo.com