Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000) group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000)

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:16 UTC

Message

RE: [bc2000] smoother pots and faders?

2007-01-17 by Elea

I think again this has more to do with midi data: for instante, I have configured as equalizers sets of 3 rotaries.

Rot 1=Cut&Boost (press=reset to 0)

Rot 2=Freq selector (press=reset to a certain freq, depending on the eq band)

Rot 3=Bandwidth (Q) (press=reset to 0)

Now, for the Cut&Boost or the Bandwidth controls I217;m quite happy with standard resolution, but for the Freq selector control, what you guys describe was happening: the resolution of the pot wouldn´t let me select certain frequencies and would jump through them more than any other thing. What I did was to configure THAT pot as a 14bit pot and give it a resolution of 20000 steps instead of the 127 that a standard midi pot resolution has. I works like a charm now.

To use a pot for a filter sweep, etc, you will have to adjust the relation between steps to get the right \u201cFeeling\u201d under your hand.

The BCF/BCR2000 have to be heavily configured to get them to be as great as there are (because believe me, they are great units), but again, for the price you pay I find it worth spending some days adjusting it to work the way I want it to work, for what I want it to work. Another option is also using any of the emulation modes. Mackie emulation works great for some things.

Cheers

Elea

De: bc2000@yahoogroups.com [mailto:bc2000@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de Erik Bowen
Enviado el: martes, 16 de enero de 2007 20:50
Para: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: Re: [bc2000] smoother pots and faders?

Yep, another problem, which I think arises from the same problem mentioned in your last email. If you move the fader/pot slowly, it will probably sound a lot closer to how it sounds when you move your mouse slowly, than the difference between how it sounds when you move both fast.

It's pretty sad, because even less expensive MIDI controllers have much more responsive faders/pots than those on my BCF2000. Behringer really had its head up its ass on this one, imo... motorized faders and LED lit rotaries are a great idea, but they're almost useless if they're not responsive.

----- Original Message -----

From: the19thbear

Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:25 AM

Subject: [bc2000] smoother pots and faders?

another question, is it possible to get the pots and faders to react
more smoothly? sometimes there is a big difference when i control a
synth filter with the mouse and then with the bcf2000.... the mouse
sounds alot more smooth!

thanks

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.