Hi! You are of course right about the "acceleration" feature, it can even be tweaked using those custom editors we have, right? So even with a 24 PPR encoder you wouldn't have to turn six whole rounds to get from 0 to 127... But I'm pretty sure the originals have 96 pulses per revolution. Mark an encoder with blu-tack and start turning really slowly, so the acceleration doesn't kick in... 24 is about a quarter of a turn, 48 is half way and 96 is full circle. (And it shows every value in between.) -- tero On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Bob S. <tttsystems@...> wrote: > However, i think you guys are off track on the pulses per revolution and I am tending to think the 24 or lower number > is correct. As a hardware and software designer, I would not let the pulse per revolution determine the number of > items I would scroll through, only at the slow one click at a time pace. I would calculate the time between pulses to > determine how many numbers to scroll through, that is, the faster the user is turning the knob, the faster the > scrolling data/value will increment or decrement. This makes the pulses per revolution only important as a scaling > factor for the scroll rate calculation....
Message
Re: [bc2000] Re: -- encoders type ? --
2012-04-02 by Tero Mäyränen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.