Great, thank you for that information !
Bob S.
El Segundo, CA
�
-----Original Message-----
From: Tero Mäyränen
Sent: Apr 2, 2012 11:26 AM
To: bc2000@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [bc2000] Re: -- encoders type ? --
�;Hi!
You are of course right about the "acceleration" feature, it can even
be tweaked using those custom editors we have, right? So even with a
24 PPR encoder you wouldn't have to turn six whole rounds to get from
0 to 127...
But I'm pretty sure the originals have 96 pulses per revolution. Mark
an encoder with blu-tack and start turning really slowly, so the
acceleration doesn't kick in... 24 is about a quarter of a turn, 48 is
half way and 96 is full circle. (And it shows every value in between.)
--
tero
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Bob S. <tttsystems@...> wrote:
> However, i think you guys are off track on the pulses per revolution and I am tending to think the 24 or lower number
> is correct. As a hardware and software designer, I would not let the pulse per revolution determine the number of
> items I would scroll through, only at the slow one click at a time pace.� I would calculate the time between pulses to
> determine how many numbers to scroll through, that is, the faster the user is turning the knob, the faster the
> scrolling data/value will increment or decrement.� This makes the pulses per revolution only important as a scaling
> factor for the scroll rate calculation....