Bc2000 (for the BCF2000 & BCR2000)

Just got back into town and I was sitting down to finally try Royce's 
resolution tweaks when I read this...  Shall I not bother with the 
resolution tweaking?  I'm afraid I'm a little lost regarding what you 
two have seemed to figure out here.

Thanks


--- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, "abhunkin" <abhunkin@...> wrote:
>
> I agree.
> 
> Art Hunkins
> 
> --- In bc2000@yahoogroups.com, "rpcfender" <rpcfender@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Art
> > > 
> > > I'm not quite sure how to answer, but - using your script - the 
> > > output does cover the complete pitch bend range, 0 0 to 127 127 
> (all 
> > > dec here).
> > > 
> > > Every point on the fader registers an identical value, whether 
> you go 
> > > fast to get there or not. Of course, if you go slower, more 
> > > intermediate values are registered (as seen in MIDIOx). Going 
as 
> > > slowly as possible, there is a low byte change of about 40-50 
> (dec); 
> > > so certainly far more than simple high-byte values (128 of 
them) 
> can 
> > > be used, if desired.
> > > 
> > So it looks like the faders have a resolution of 127 * 3 about 
380.
> > Thanks makes sense. I guess there would be no need to use the
> > resolution command and just rely on the sampling rate of the fader
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > 
> > Royce
> >
>