The ASR is a CV processor, not a signal processor. I haven't tried
clocking it at audio rates. Obviously the clock would come through very
strongly in the output. Feedback is a useful principle in general
though. If you mixed one of the outputs together with the input CV it
would impart a cyclical memory, like mixing back part of a sample and
hold output with its input. I've always used the ASR to shift CVs that
control the frequency of VCOs, so I can have one quantized CV control
three VCOs in an arabesque. Mixing back would wreck the quantization,
but I am going to try this out.
-Richard Brewster
xamboldt wrote:
clocking it at audio rates. Obviously the clock would come through very
strongly in the output. Feedback is a useful principle in general
though. If you mixed one of the outputs together with the input CV it
would impart a cyclical memory, like mixing back part of a sample and
hold output with its input. I've always used the ASR to shift CVs that
control the frequency of VCOs, so I can have one quantized CV control
three VCOs in an arabesque. Mixing back would wreck the quantization,
but I am going to try this out.
-Richard Brewster
xamboldt wrote:
>Hello Everyone,
>
>Has anyone with an Analog Shift Register used a mixer to send feedback from
>one of the taps back to the input? Strangely enough, I had a dream about
>this (yes my subconscious has even fallen to obsessing about this stuff!),
>and I'm wondering if it would be a worthwhile feature to build in to the ASR
>I'll be building eventually...
>
>Seems like it could be used as sort of a very short granular delay...
>
>-Chris
>
>
>
>