Cgs synth

Yeah, it's not designed for processing audio, but it does handle bipolar
signals, right? I imagine it would sound very nasty processing audio,
dividing it into narrow slices (grains) - although to have an output
resembling audio it would have to be clocked very quickly, so it might just
end up sounding like a square wave tremolo or even a ring modulator. I'm not
even sure what feedback would do in that situation.

I guess the logical conclusion of where my brain was headed on this, if it's
used to control CVs, would be a Wiard Noise Ring.

Nevertheless, I'm very interested to see what your experimentation
produces...

-Chris

On 10/22/05 9:30 PM, "Richard Brewster" <pugix@...> wrote:

> The ASR is a CV processor, not a signal processor. I haven't tried
> clocking it at audio rates. Obviously the clock would come through very
> strongly in the output. Feedback is a useful principle in general
> though. If you mixed one of the outputs together with the input CV it
> would impart a cyclical memory, like mixing back part of a sample and
> hold output with its input. I've always used the ASR to shift CVs that
> control the frequency of VCOs, so I can have one quantized CV control
> three VCOs in an arabesque. Mixing back would wreck the quantization,
> but I am going to try this out.
>
> -Richard Brewster
>
> xamboldt wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Has anyone with an Analog Shift Register used a mixer to send feedback from
>> one of the taps back to the input? Strangely enough, I had a dream about
>> this (yes my subconscious has even fallen to obsessing about this stuff!),
>> and I'm wondering if it would be a worthwhile feature to build in to the ASR
>> I'll be building eventually...
>>
>> Seems like it could be used as sort of a very short granular delay...
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>