I made a different profile for my 308g Hahnemuhle. Other than the hand the blacks do seem darker even to the eye. I am using an Epson R1800 with an Epson Velvet Fine Art setting, Best Photo etc. Its a very nice paper. I'm going to try some new B&W prints with the extended grey targets when possible. My family has been a little under the weather the last week or so which severely cut into my creative time :-) Thankfuly that seems to be breaking so we can get back to making prints! YAY! Tom Which printer are both of you using? --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "florent_thouret" <florent@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a message posted by someone on the > "DigitalBlackandWitheThePrint" yahoo group a few days ago, without > answer... > > I'm also interested because I made (with success) a PFP 2.0 profile > for 188gr, and expecting using it with 308gr (188 is cheaper than 308). > > As a PFP2 user, is it needed to make another profile for 308gr ? > > Thanks, > Florent > > > > Hello, > > > I am beginning to test with the paper Hahnemühle PhotoRag. I use 188gr. > > for the tests and 308gr for the final copy. > > > Reading the characteristics of these two papers, I see that they are > > different in the ink limit: > > > 188gr ink limit: >>220 > > 308gr ink limit: >>240 > > > it means that 308gr. can have a greater Dmax? > > > Then, the tests which I do with 188gr are not valid for 308gr, that it > > can accept more ink? > > > greetings, > > jose. >
Message
Re: Hahnemühle PhotoRag 188 & 308
2006-12-11 by Tom
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.