Sounds like I should standardize my workflow on the driver so I can print from either Pshop or Qimage. The driver is crazy with all the paper settings and options all over the place. The epson driver makes so much more sense to me... -Jonathan --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/14/06 1:36:17 AM, jpgentry@... writes: > > > > > I will be using Hahnemeuhle Photo Rag, William Turner and Breathing > > Color Chromata canvas on the new Canon. Do you recommend profiling > > these paper types with the Canon driver or the Photoshop export > > module. I have heard that there are much better results to be had > > from the 16bit export module. Is that your experience? > > > I find them to be virtually identical in output, once each is profiled via > its own workflow (in other words, profile the export module through the export > module, and the driver through the driver). I suspect that those seeing a > difference are running into one or another of the bugs in these drivers, but who > knows... perhaps its a platform difference. > > > > Lastly I am assuming that the export module cannot be used with > > > I haven't tried the export module with Qimage, being Mac-based. But I would > actually be suprised if it WAS accessible to Qimage... > > C. David Tobie > Product Technology Manager > ColorVision Business Unit > Datacolor Inc. > CDTobie@... > www.colorvision.com >
Message
Re: ipF8000 on the way.
2006-12-15 by potomacbassfisher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.