Forget trying to make patch reading easier/faster, it's already a breeze. But here's an idea for profile accuracy. This could be done with a modification of the software or outside the software with a nifty Excel spreadsheet (and I hope this wasn't already thought of but it may have been.) You really don't want to average profiles, you just want to cast out anomalies. So you must take a minimum of three readings per patch. The program (spreadsheet whatever) will look at the readings on the three and searh for the reading that is out of bounds keeping an average of the two closest reading (or just one of them.) This would be a sure way to catch a false read on a patch. Let me know what you think. On an unrealated note - Every time I install after using the program and closing out I'm getting an error when reopening the program to use it the second time. Program is crashing on me and not sure why. I've uninstalled/reinstalled several times and it's always the same. I am not profiling the default printer so could it have to do with that? -Jonathan
Message
Idea for profile accuracy
2006-03-09 by potomacbassfisher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.