Thanks for the info! I am going thru the papers right now. Where can I get the upgrade? David Miller wrote: >>OK, I noticed something on my test print with the babys. Although I >>have a perfect nozzle check and no banding, (checked with a lupe) the >>right paper selected (epson luster) and the driver set to no color >>adjustment, The gradients do not drop off evenly I can see problems in >>the browns all over that place. >> >> > >That's right, that's what building the printer profle is going to adjust >for. > >The more unevenly things drop off; the harder the paper is to profile; >and the more likely it is that your results will be improved by going to >the 729 patch target. > > > >>It was my understanding that all targets be printed with no color >>adjustment at the printer settings that you will be printing at with the >>created profile. >> >> > >Yes, that's correct (and then later on, when you print through the profile, >you need to have the printer driver set up -exactly- the same way, otherwise >all bets are off...:-) > > > >>SO....Why would I want to set this printer at anything else other than >>what epson wanted it set at? >> >> >> > >You may find that other media settings in the driver may behave better >than others, with color adjustment turned off in the printer drive. David >Tobie has incorporated a number of excellent, detailed notes about what >to look for; in the Help file for the Media Setting Check page; if you haven't >read those yet, it's well worth the time to do so. It's often worth testing >several different media settings before you profile, to see what it is that >the driver will be doing before any profiling takes place. > >You may discover that some non-standard media settings may give you less >blocking in the shadows; better uncalibrated transitions in gradients; >more saturated extremes; richer blacks; etc. The Media Setting check is >is PFP's useful new feature that can help you figure this out. > > > >>What else is there to change and still leave it on no color adjustment? >>Paper is all there is. >> >> > >That's right, but that's important. You will get different results when you >print through different media settings. You can print on Premium Luster, for >example, through the Premium Glossy media setting to see what the differences >are. Also try the "film" setting (I had built a profile for the 1280, for >Premium Luster, through the "film" setting that was amazing). > >(Note that the Epson driver won't let you print with all media settings on >all papers; there are limits to how "bad" it will let you be; some of the >limits may seem arbitrary, but Epson probably knew what they were doing when >they put them in; if a media setting is dimmed, there's most likely a reason >why Epson doesn't want you to go there). > >Once you've printed the Media Setting Check image through several different >settings, you can measure the black patch on each, compare the L values, and >see which media setting gives you the deepest black. Some media settings in >the driver will give you more black than others. (Yes, the media setting check >image is small, and the patches are small; but everyone who has access to the >new 1.1b5 version will discover that you can now print all of those 1/4 size >test and print preview images at -full- size on the page; and if you print >any of the Target images, you can always measure their black patch, of course). > >Once again: the best documentation on how to use and interpret the Media >Setting Check image, in combination with different driver settings, is the >Help file. > > >Best regards, > > > >
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] first profile
2006-03-11 by randy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.