--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <trboley@...> wrote: > > Hi John, well, I did not explain myself well. I certainly did not pay > $2k for this monitor, I think only around $350 on sale. I meant it was > hard to swallow the idea of spending that much on a really good one, > which seems to be the prices, on something not quite as good as my old > CRTs. > I'm having trouble with the evolution in general, from CRTs, and was > wondering if my experiences were unique. Oh sorry...misunderstood you regarding the price. Good you only paid $350.00. > The settings on this thing right now are- > Contrast- 71 > Brightness- 100 > Color tone- Warm1 > gamma- -0.1 > color weakness custom2 Holy Moly that's some messed up info! Warm1? Color Weakness? Crud! Have you tried setting the Contrast to 100% and just use the Brightness setting to lower the luminous? Is there a way to reset to default setttings or zero out the settings? > lord knows what much of that means or how I even arrived at it. There > must be some kind of law that new products must not adhere to excepted > industry wide and well known settings nomenclature. Color temp? Why > have that? > It's probably just not a very good monitor, and will get relegated to > a lesser box. > Still, it doesn't make me feel real comfortable about the move to LCDs > in general... Yeah the Apple LCD seems very good to me. I've heard some good things about NECs. I have used Eizo ColorEdge LCDs...really nice just too dang pricey. I have a cheap 19" Dell that does OK...the shadows block up from 91% to 100%...only notice when doing low-key B&W. Also if I change my viewing angle (45 degrees sideways) I can see to about 97%. I'm sure that doesn't instill confidence in LCDs!
Message
Re: possible OT: LCD advice
2008-04-24 by John Vitollo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.