Hi Mr Tobie, I'm trying to avoid printing it through photoshop at this stage as i'm afraid i'll add in some other variances that could affect the measurements. I'll rather print it from the Spyderprint/printfix pro application - when i do that i know i have produced the correct patch printouts. In photoshop - There'll be too many settings in the photoshop print dialog for to screw-up. Thank-you. --- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, Cdtobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > > If your peinter will only print letter/A4 size, there are quartered > 225 patch target files in the Targets folder. Print those on letter or > A4 from Photoshop, using the "size to fit" option in the driver, and > assemble after printing into a 16 x 20 sheet. That should be quite > easy to read. If your printer will print larger sheets, then all the > targets will print with larger patches on any larger sheet size, > direct from the application. > > C. D. Tobie > WW Product Technology Mngr. > Digital Imaging & Home Theater > DataColor.com > CDTobie@... > > On Jan 2, 2009, at 8:01 PM, "edmcgrath18" <edmcgrath18@...> wrote: > > > Hi. > > I know i've asked this before and so has probably others but i believe > > it's still justified. I want a larger patch size option for ease of > > measurement. It would be best if the current size (it can't get any > > smaller than current setup) is the minimum and then there would be a > > medium and then large or even super size patch. > > > > I know one can minimize the margins and on the epson TX100 drivers i > > could also enlarge the test print (but it does get off centred and > > luckily all the patches were still on the paper). Sometimes minimizing > > the margins still produce a pretty tight patch for reading. > > > > Most of the effort in measuring the patches goes to aligning and > > centering the reader over the patches. And its' very tight currently > > so > > it does slow down the whole process when i have to be sure i don't > > make > > a mistake by including another small piece of the next patch. I know > > some of you can crank out a reading over mere minutes but i do get a > > bit cross-eyed and need to take a few breaks or else i'll make a > > mistake. > > > > There is still a lot of white spaces all round the patches and we can > > also forgo the notes area below for the patches to grow. > > > > Can we have it the next version - hopefully very very soon? - Please. > > > > Thank-you. > > > > Ed. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Larger Patch size will be more ergonomic and make patch measurement more fun.
2009-01-03 by edmcgrath18
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.