On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Rollin wrote: > I have two monitors on the system running off a single video card > and use the WinColor app to load the profiles. One is the Eizo > CG222W and the other is a Dell 1905FP. The Dell is a simple backlit > flat panel. I use the Eizo as my main (color managed) screen for > soft proofing under Photoshop and use the Dell as a secondary > monitor to park the various tool menus under PS as it is not the > best thing in the world for color managed applications. > > So, from mu perspective, there is no "non-problematic" monitor. I > just ran calibration using the Spyder3 software on both monitors > and then took readings using the Spyder3 Colorimeter option under > the Tools menu. > > Dell > 6567K > 98.877L, -3.027a, -19.424b > > Eizo > 6534K > Lab = 89.805L, -2.7629a, -17.590b > > Visually, the Eizo appears to have a green caste. When I display > the same image on both monitors, the Eizo loooks "warmer" and, if > there is green in the image, it seems to really make it pop where > as the Dell appears "cooler" and the blues look stronger on > . > > Thanks for the tip on the tools menu. I never used that. I took a > look at my calibration and got Lab L=106.945 a=-2.245 b=-21.070 and K=6529 This is on a MacBook Pro set at 6500K and 2.2G. I can't comment on the a & b values; they seem to be close to yours. However, your L values seems to be very low, especially for the Eizo. Shouldn't pure white be a=b=0? < 5 seems like it ought to be okay, but 20 seems to be pretty high. I normally run at 5400K because it matched my printer better. On that I got: L=103.955 a=-1.910 b=-6.921 and K=5473 For other temperatures, a seems to stay around -2, but b grows: -2 @ 5400 -13 @ 5800 -18 @ 6200 -21 @ 6500 I have no idea what that means, if anything. >
Message
Re: [datacolor_group] Re: Checking Spyder3
2009-08-10 by Robert Peirce
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.