--- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > Which CMM is used does not really cause much variation in results; it's a bit like worrying about which brand of motor oil is used in your car... As long as the workflow is functioning for you, I wouldn't worry about it. Whilst normally I'd completely agree that such concerns are not really that relevant, in the Mac version of the Canon plugin there is a similar 64 bit limitation. This means that in 64 bit I only get perceptual, sat or rel col with no BPC available. The option of BPC can be quite handy :-) Depending on the profiles I'm using and what software made them, I can see noticeable difference in -some- images between the options. I'll admit that it's not much, but it would be nice if Adobe did get round to making the external CMM run OK at 64 bit (Mac and Win)
Message
Re: Adobe CMM vs OS color management Windows 7 64bit
2010-11-22 by keith
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.