On Nov 22, 2010, at 9:07 AM, keith wrote: > --- In datacolor_group@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: >> Which CMM is used does not really cause much variation in results; it's a bit like worrying about which brand of motor oil is used in your car... As long as the workflow is functioning for you, I wouldn't worry about it. > > Whilst normally I'd completely agree that such concerns are not really that relevant, in the Mac version of the Canon plugin there is a similar 64 bit limitation. > > This means that in 64 bit I only get perceptual, sat or rel col with no BPC available. > > The option of BPC can be quite handy :-) > > Depending on the profiles I'm using and what software made them, I can see noticeable difference in -some- images between the options. > > I'll admit that it's not much, but it would be nice if Adobe did get round to making the external CMM run OK at 64 bit (Mac and Win) I don't disagree; though I'd rather that Adobe perform the much simpler task of adding a checkbox to turn BPC <off> in Lightroom first, before they develop an entire 64bit CMM to allow users to turn it <on> in direct export modules... C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging & Home Theater CDTobie@... Datacolor www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
Message
Re: [datacolor_group] Re: Adobe CMM vs OS color management Windows 7 64bit
2010-11-22 by C D Tobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.