On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:13 PM, johnlill2 wrote: > My problem is that the softproof in the Datacolor software is very faded so it is useless to see if I want to tweak it. Since softproof in Photoshop & Qimage are accurate, I can just use that to see if I want to tweak anything. In my experience softproof in Print, and softproof in Photoshop are nearly identical: if the paper white and ink black checkboxes are checked in Photoshop. I can't imagine any reason why the softproof would be different for you between the two, given the proper settings in Photoshop (there are not settings in Print). The display profile is used by both apps. The print profile is used similarly by both apps, at those settings. Its a mystery. Can you email me (to address below) a zipped profile that shows this differential, so I can compare it on my end, and a zipped measurement set from which that profile was made? thanks, C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Datacolor 5 Princess Road Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA 609.924.2189 www.datacolor.com Phone: 207.685.9248 Mobile: 207.312.0448 Fax: 207.685.4455 Email: cdtobie@datacolor.com Skype: cdtobie
Message
Re: [datacolor_group] Re: softproof in Spyder3Print SR way off
2011-08-23 by C D Tobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.