Yahoo Groups archive

Datacolor User to User Support Group.

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:18 UTC

Message

Re: Test image

2006-03-19 by Douglas Ross

Have you tried with a different paper or ink? Some ink and paper
combos just don't work, that posterizing is just ugly with your
profile. I soft profed and printed with a profile I made with PFP for
my I9900 and have no problems at all with posterizing or purple shift.

I'm probably no help but if no profile yet handles this ink paper
combo maybe its not the fault of the profile.

Just my 2 cents, Doug

--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, randy <rlphoto@...> wrote:
>
> Here is a background (the same image I posted earlier).
> 
> www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/bluetestimage.tif
> 
> and the same profile...
> 
> 
> www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/7600epluster.icm
> 
> 
> This is also an image that I would not be able to use the printfix
pro profile on.  
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> randy wrote:
> 
> >Here is a senior portrait with a lot of blue that just gets murdered.
> >
> >www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/Lindseybluetest.tif
> >
> >and the printfix profile....
> >
> >www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/7600epluster.icm
> >
> >Randy
> >
> >
> >
> >randy wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>What would be a good test image?   I just through one out there that 
> >>might be troublesome since is had a lot of full saturation colors.
> >>
> >>Randy
> >>
> >>CDTobie@... wrote:
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>In a message dated 3/19/06 2:13:16 PM, rlphoto@... writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>I only used prophoto because that way all available data would
be there
> >>>>to convert to.  My main workflow is srgb because that is what my lab
> >>>>uses. I will change to Adobe if I can see any real difference. 
Just for
> >>>>the record I have ran these problem images thru adobe rgb with no
> >>>>difference in blue issues.
> >>>>
> >>>>I will repost my test image in Adobe rgb
> >>>>     
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>Turns out little or none of your test image is outside AdobeRGB,
so it 
> >>>may not matter, though converting it to AdobeRGb is still a more 
> >>>reasonable starting point. Also not much of it is outside the
gamut of 
> >>>most monitors, which is also helpful. But there is no photographic 
> >>>content or memory colors, so its difficult for people to know what 
> >>>they should be expecting from it...
> >>>
> >>>C. David Tobie
> >>>Product Technology Manager
> >>>ColorVision, Inc.
> >>>CDTobie@...
> >>>www.colorvision.com
> >>>
> >>>SPONSORED LINKS
> >>>Digital photography software 
>
>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+software&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=vcZVcv11-RF9aChCrpL-cA>

> >>>	Digital photography 
>
>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=NPMG-BjOjJWWWu1WTDecRQ>

> >>>	Digital photography course 
>
>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+course&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=GPs-R_fGq5Hih2NpQczQ8g>

> >>>
> >>>Photography school 
>
>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Photography+school&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=pj3cKQlkMhgkqUXNMJjiCw>

> >>>	Professional digital photography 
>
>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Professional+digital+photography&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=k7x9GYFzNn4NfJTZP-Vt_g>

> >>>	Stock photography 
>
>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Stock+photography&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=H9bHMH_cKn4LEqWkcUABgg>

> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >>>
> >>>   *  Visit your group "colorvision_group
> >>>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colorvision_group>" on the web.
> >>>      
> >>>   *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >>>      colorvision_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >>>    
<mailto:colorvision_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >>>      
> >>>   *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> >>>     Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date:
3/17/2006
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>
> >>Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> > 
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.