Well, this is epson ultrachrome ink ink and epson premium luster paper. I have been printing the last 3 years with the epson stock profile. Randy Douglas Ross wrote: >Have you tried with a different paper or ink? Some ink and paper >combos just don't work, that posterizing is just ugly with your >profile. I soft profed and printed with a profile I made with PFP for >my I9900 and have no problems at all with posterizing or purple shift. > >I'm probably no help but if no profile yet handles this ink paper >combo maybe its not the fault of the profile. > >Just my 2 cents, Doug > >--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, randy <rlphoto@...> wrote: > > >>Here is a background (the same image I posted earlier). >> >>www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/bluetestimage.tif >> >>and the same profile... >> >> >>www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/7600epluster.icm >> >> >>This is also an image that I would not be able to use the printfix >> >> >pro profile on. > > >>Randy >> >> >> >> >>randy wrote: >> >> >> >>>Here is a senior portrait with a lot of blue that just gets murdered. >>> >>>www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/Lindseybluetest.tif >>> >>>and the printfix profile.... >>> >>>www.laskodyphotography.com/bluetest/7600epluster.icm >>> >>>Randy >>> >>> >>> >>>randy wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>What would be a good test image? I just through one out there that >>>>might be troublesome since is had a lot of full saturation colors. >>>> >>>>Randy >>>> >>>>CDTobie@... wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>In a message dated 3/19/06 2:13:16 PM, rlphoto@... writes: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I only used prophoto because that way all available data would >>>>>> >>>>>> >be there > > >>>>>>to convert to. My main workflow is srgb because that is what my lab >>>>>>uses. I will change to Adobe if I can see any real difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> >Just for > > >>>>>>the record I have ran these problem images thru adobe rgb with no >>>>>>difference in blue issues. >>>>>> >>>>>>I will repost my test image in Adobe rgb >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>Turns out little or none of your test image is outside AdobeRGB, >>>>> >>>>> >so it > > >>>>>may not matter, though converting it to AdobeRGb is still a more >>>>>reasonable starting point. Also not much of it is outside the >>>>> >>>>> >gamut of > > >>>>>most monitors, which is also helpful. But there is no photographic >>>>>content or memory colors, so its difficult for people to know what >>>>>they should be expecting from it... >>>>> >>>>>C. David Tobie >>>>>Product Technology Manager >>>>>ColorVision, Inc. >>>>>CDTobie@... >>>>>www.colorvision.com >>>>> >>>>>SPONSORED LINKS >>>>>Digital photography software >>>>> >>>>> >>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+software&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=vcZVcv11-RF9aChCrpL-cA> >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> Digital photography >>>>> >>>>> >>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=NPMG-BjOjJWWWu1WTDecRQ> >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> Digital photography course >>>>> >>>>> >>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+course&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=GPs-R_fGq5Hih2NpQczQ8g> >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>Photography school >>>>> >>>>> >>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Photography+school&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=pj3cKQlkMhgkqUXNMJjiCw> >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> Professional digital photography >>>>> >>>>> >>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Professional+digital+photography&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=k7x9GYFzNn4NfJTZP-Vt_g> >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> Stock photography >>>>> >>>>> >>>><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Stock+photography&w1=Digital+photography+software&w2=Digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+course&w4=Photography+school&w5=Professional+digital+photography&w6=Stock+photography&c=6&s=176&.sig=H9bHMH_cKn4LEqWkcUABgg> >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>>>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS >>>>> >>>>> * Visit your group "colorvision_group >>>>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colorvision_group>" on the web. >>>>> >>>>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >>>>> colorvision_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ><mailto:colorvision_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > > >>>>> >>>>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of >>>>> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>>>Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: >>>>> >>>>> >3/17/2006 > > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Yahoo! Groups Links >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [colorvision_group] Re: Test image
2006-03-20 by randy