--- In colorvision_group@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote:
> >
> > There was a lot of PR about the new color management engine in
Vista for the
> year before its release, but most of it does not actually apply to
the
> released product. Vista defaults to the same ICM2 calls and
settings as XP (and 2000,
> and Win98...), and there is not really any way for users to access
anything
> more, so its basicly a matter of what minor fixes or bugs were
introduced.
>
This is quite interesting. From your description it sounds like not
much has changed in the ICM. I was under impression that apart from
bug fixes the ICM inside Vista's WCS now also supports things like
ICC V4 (honestly, I do not know if it matters much for monitor
calibration, but anyway). I wonder if the updated ICM offer any real
benefits in terms of monitor calibration and the display accuracy?
A little bacground - I am among those people on WIndows XP that have
problems with the way Lightroom displays the image in the Develop
screen as opposed to the the way the image looks in the exported file
in another color managed app (the difference with my setup is mostly
in deep blacks under certain develop setting - this all with Spyder
calibrated monitor etc.) - Adobe seems to be pointing the finger at
the Windows ICM that LR uses to generate its on-screen previews.
Initially I thought that Vista might cure this due to its upgraded
ICM, but I have seen reports that the same problems occur in LR also
under Vista. This and what you are saying seems to suggest that Vista
does not offer any improvement (at least as far as LR is concerned).