Yahoo Groups archive

Disklavier

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Message

[disklavier] Re: Disklavier egroup

2000-03-01 by Hoffman, Steve

No body is threatened by the PianoDisc folks.  It is just that some
Disklavier owners, my self included, are not interested in spending any time
on the PianoDisc issues. We are very busy people and thus need to prioritize
what we want to do, and reading about Piano Disk is not one of those
priorities. If I wanted to learn more about it, I could sign-up to it's
designated user-group. It is totally transparent to the user to be a member
of multiple user-groups. Maybe Todd Muncy can initiate a survey to find out
if anybody in this Disklavier group is interested in merging the various
groups. Personally I oppose a merger.

Steve


		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Jim Moore [mailto:moore7@...]
		Sent:	Tuesday, February 29, 2000 4:13 PM
		To:	disklavier@egroups.com
		Subject:	[disklavier] Re: Disklavier egroup

		Hi,

		No offense taken!

		I was under the impression that the site was open to all as
you say. One
		of the great things about an open site, of this type, is it
can give
		ideas to either, or more, group(s) that are interested in
this subject.
		It appears "some" seem almost threatened by the PianoDisc
folks, but I
		think it should a case of either Fords or Chevrolets that
is: whatever
		appeals to an individual.

		Sorry I don't mean to "preach to the choir".

		Jim Moore




	
------------------------------------------------------------------------
		To Post a message, send it to:   disklavier@...
		To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
disklavier-unsubscribe@...

	
------------------------------------------------------------------------
		The Hottest Female Musicians!
		Right on your computer!
		http://click.egroups.com/1/1994/1/_/156037/_/951869613/

		eGroups.com Home: http://www.egroups.com/group/disklavier/
		http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.