Yahoo Groups archive

Disklavier

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Message

Re: [disklavier] Questions For Any Owners of A Mark IV Disklavier

2004-12-04 by Tom Wheeler

Garry,

Thank you very much for kindly responding and answering my questions.  
My Yamaha disklavier dealer called me this afternoon to tell me that he 
had a DC3M4t which arrived yesterday set up and ready for me to look 
at.  I will be getting a chance to see and play it tomorrow afternoon.

I suspect that if you are pleased with the balance between the ensemble 
(tone generated) sound volume and the volume of the acoustic piano, then 
I will be to.  Perhaps the efficiency of the speakers in the Mark IV 
disklaviers is greater than in the Mark III models.  Thanks for letting 
me know that the USB on the Mark IV is USB 2.0 since I wanted to be able 
to use an external USB 2.0 HD for additional storage should the need 
arise.  It's also nice to hear that there is no amplifier hum although I 
do not have that problem on my present DC3A either.

I suspect that Yamaha rushed the software controlling the wireless to 
get the piano to market by Christmas.  I feel confident that Yamaha will 
address quickly problems that may exist in the software via user 
installed firmware/software upgrades as they have done in the past.


Thank you again.


Tom

Garry Neil wrote:

>My Mk IV sounds good to me with ensemble and CDs. I
>never had a Mk III so I can't compare.  There are a
>couple of USB 2 ports and I regularly use one for a
>thumb drive.  It works well and is vastly superior to
>floppies.  
>
>On the downside I am a little disappointed by some
>clunkiness of the interface, the aggravating tendency
>for entered song titles to revert or disappear and the
>relatively poor range of the wireless network it uses.
> On the other hand I suppose that if it was more
>powerful it could compete with the wireless network in
>my house.
>
>In all it is a great instrument.
>
>BTW there is certainly no amplifier hum.
>  
>
>  
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.