Good morning, everyone. On Oct 14, 2008, at 10:40 AM, driller010165 wrote: > Hi, > > Someone is asking me what format my Disklavier Mark III can play and I > had no idea what it meant. Which one has the best quality for Mark III > with record function? I have a Yamaha DGC1-B. His choices were: > > GM > GM2 > GM-XG > XG > > The GS did not play on my Mark III. > > TIA > Just to be clear: There are MIDI file formats and then there are MIDI protocols for setting the correct sounds. Modern Disklaviers read MIDI file formats called: --Standard MIDI File Type 0 --Standard MIDI File Type 1 --E-SEQ SMF 0 and 1 are industry standard formats. E-SEQ is an older, proprietary format pioneered by Yamaha before SMF was defined. Natively, modern Disklaviers record in SMF. However, Yamaha has typically published song files in E-SEQ in order to maintain backward compatibility with older instruments. GM, GM2, XG, and GS are names for sets of sounds, not file formats. In the old days, each manufacturer had a proprietary set of sounds that were uniquely numbered. For example, Sound #7 might be flute in one case on bass in another. In order to make it possible for MIDI file authors to create files that played back a broad range of devices from different manufacturers, the industry adopted a set of sounds called General MIDI (GM). The quality of GM sounds varies from one instrument to another. But when you hear a GM file played on any GM device, you can be confident that you are hearing the correct sounds. There are 128 sounds in the GM set plus a drum kit. Of course, MIDI file authors want even more choices. Accordingly, Yamaha came up with a superset of GM called XG. Roland came up with a different superset called GS. A couple of years ago, there was an attempt to make an industry-standard superset of GM called GM2. I don't know of any professionally authored files that use GM2, and GM2 does not seem to have caught the public's imagination. There are lots of XG and GS MIDI files, however. If you play an XG, GM2, or GS file on a device that only knows about GM, the file should play reasonably accurately, with appropriate voice substitutions. Since the Mark II, Disklaviers have had a GM and XG tone set. Some Disklaviers have also included a tone set called TG300B, which is really a GS voice set in disguise. I don't think that Mark IVs include that set. Regards, PianoBench
Message
Re: [disklavier] Which MIDI format sound best on Mark III
2008-10-16 by George F. Litterst
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.