> > The A-161 has only one chip -- a CD4024 -- and the rest is
> > discrete. The A-160 has a CD4017 plus discrete parts. They should
> > work fine on +/-15V.
>
> OK, lets just cut to the chase here on this clock divider. Unless
> you already own one, conversion is a waste of money. The PCB and
> electronic parts are worth less than $10. The rest of it (the
> expensive parts) the panel, jacks and such you have to replace
> anyhow.
True. If you are a DIYer, you don't need these modules. For those who want
kits, Ken Stone covers some of this ground, and MOTM panel designs exist.
Example: http://www.wiseguysynth.com/larry/panel/gif/cgs_div_bool.gif
> This is a dirt simple circuit.
One notch above a Forrest Mim's book. ;-)
> As John pointed out, it has only one
> chip. I imagine he is using transistors for the output drivers in
> switching mode.
Right, like Ken Stone does on his pulse divider:
http://www.cgs.synth.net/modules/cgs36_pulse_divider.html
As for the Doepfers, the A-161 Gate Sequencer has no front panel inputs, 8
outputs and 8 BC547 trannies, thus one per output. But the A-160 Clock
Divider seems to have more transistors than outputs. It doesn't really
matter -- I don't need to know how these Doepfer modules work, I'm just
commenting since it came up.
> So, I imagine if you run it on 15V you will get
> higher voltage swing on the outputs.
Would this higher voltage be a problem? This is obviously a common
technique. Hmmm... Are different resistor values needed around the buffer
trannies, depending on the power supply voltage?
> If you have any building skills at all buy the Blacet Binary Zone.
> It is a far more interesting and versitale module than a simple clock
> divider. OK, I realize it does not have individual outputs.
The BZ looks cool, but the individual outs are what I want this for.
> But,
> they are very simple to add if you like. John will even sell you the
> "basic version" of the module which comes without panel, knobs, jacks
> and pots.
It's so cool that he does that.
> > I'd take panels for one A-161 and two A-160s, since I have them
> > already. But I'd like more of the Doepfer clock and logic modules,
> > or the same type of panels for DIY modules.
>
> Give us an idea of what you want on the panel. We can do it.
> Larry
Great, but I might want it in MOTM format! (Oops, wrong list... ;-)
Who does the panel designs and artwor, anyway -- the buyers or the Stooges?
--
johnMessage
Re: [dotcomformat] doepfer clockdivider in dotcom format
2005-06-09 by john mahoney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.