Yahoo Groups archive

Dotcomformat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Thread

Re: Info on COTK Modules

Re: Info on COTK Modules

2008-07-28 by jonahrust

thanks for the info on the encore frequency shifter john..
it's about $1500 cheaper than the cotk module!

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, John Mahoney <jmahoney@...> wrote:
>
> >I am currently being enticed by the COTK voice coding processor and 
> >the Bode frequency shifter. I am wondering if anyone on this list has 
> >experience with the said modules. I would also be willing to look at 
> >other analog vocoding gear if anyone knows af any.
> >
> >And I have a question about the bode frequncy shifter. would this 
> >module be able to create effects such as high pitched elf speech? is 
> >frequency shifting very diffent from digital pitch shifting? any 
> >insight would be appreciated.
> 
> My only experience with any of the above is that I've got an Encore
frequency shifter. I like it a lot! I've actually not tried to do an
"elf voice" effect with it, but it can definitely be used on voice.
However...
> 
> Analog frequency shifting and digital pitch shifting are very
different. Frequency shifting causes harmonics to become inharmonic
(reminiscent of ring modulation, in a way) whereas pitch shifting
shifts all frequencies by the same harmonic interval.
> 
> BTW, the Digitech Whammy pedal is pretty cool for cheap pitch
shifting fun.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> John
>

Re: [dotcomformat] Info on COTK Modules

2008-07-28 by John Mahoney

>I am currently being enticed by the COTK voice coding processor and 
>the Bode frequency shifter. I am wondering if anyone on this list has 
>experience with the said modules. I would also be willing to look at 
>other analog vocoding gear if anyone knows af any.
>
>And I have a question about the bode frequncy shifter. would this 
>module be able to create effects such as high pitched elf speech? is 
>frequency shifting very diffent from digital pitch shifting? any 
>insight would be appreciated.

My only experience with any of the above is that I've got an Encore frequency shifter. I like it a lot! I've actually not tried to do an "elf voice" effect with it, but it can definitely be used on voice. However...

Analog frequency shifting and digital pitch shifting are very different. Frequency shifting causes harmonics to become inharmonic (reminiscent of ring modulation, in a way) whereas pitch shifting shifts all frequencies by the same harmonic interval.

BTW, the Digitech Whammy pedal is pretty cool for cheap pitch shifting fun.

John

Re: [dotcomformat] Info on COTK Modules

2008-07-28 by Richard Wentk

On 28 Jul 2008, at 19:43, John Mahoney wrote:

> My only experience with any of the above is that I've got an Encore  
> frequency shifter. I like it a lot! I've actually not tried to do  
> an "elf voice" effect with it, but it can definitely be used on  
> voice. However...
>
> Analog frequency shifting and digital pitch shifting are very  
> different. Frequency shifting causes harmonics to become inharmonic  
> (reminiscent of ring modulation, in a way) whereas pitch shifting  
> shifts all frequencies by the same harmonic interval.

Frequency shifting *adds* a fixed offset to harmonics. So it is  
indeed very much like ring modulation - in fact it's ring modulation  
with the difference products suppressed.

Pitch shifting *multiplies* harmonics by a fixed amount. So the  
relative offsets stay the same.

If you want an elf/chipmunk voice, a pitch shifter will probably do a  
better job. Frequency shifters are better for scary distorted monster  
voices.

If you can find someone with the Arturia Virtual Moog VST plug-in, it  
has a frequency shifter module which sounds not unlike a hardware box.

(Actually you can buy a Virtual Moog and a PC to run it on for the  
cost of a hardware frequency shifter. If it were me, I'd probably  
spend the money on other modules. ;) )

Richard

Re: [dotcomformat] Info on COTK Modules

2008-07-28 by Suit & Tie Guy

On Jul 28, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Richard Wentk wrote:
> If you can find someone with the Arturia Virtual Moog VST plug-in, it
> has a frequency shifter module which sounds not unlike a hardware box.

there are also alot of digital effects processors which have  
frequency shifting.

at the high end are the eventide h8k and the TC Firworx, at the low  
end are some Zoom boxes and one of the Alesis ModFX boxen.
---
Suit & Tie Guy
suitandtieguy.com
stgsoundlabs.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.