--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "fiendishfeat" <bren@l...> wrote: > > > Hi, > I know this has been mentioned before in the past, and that > Elektron provided many good reasons why it's a very serious decision > for a synth manufacturer to consider, but does anyone have any new > thoughts on a Sidstation OS update? > > According to the usergroup archives, various people have their own > requests for a Sidstation update, and my preference (read craving) > would be the ability to address the oscillators separately on > different MIDI channels - I feel this would not only open up the > potential of the machine hugely, but that it would further > invigorate users' passion for writing pure sidtracks like back in > the day, without having to use an emulator or a real C64 to create > a .sid file, to then play through ASid. that would be SUPER!! and i think its possible.. www.ucapps.de also being able to address cc parameters in the wavetable would be powerful addition too, albeit complicated. I wouldn't have brought this > up yet *again*, but with the new influx of Sidstation owners that > will undoubtedly hit this community thanks to Elektron's recent chip > discovery and production spurt, I think it's time for some debate on > this and for people to think again about what it is they think would > be a really worthwhile addition to the Sidstation's software- > adjustable capabilities. > > So would this even be possible via an OS update - separate > oscillator addressing? Do people still want, as they've mentioned > inthe past, a 'test trigger' button, for listening to patches while > programming with just a pair of headphones, away from the mixing > desk? OK YEAH!! Anything we haven't heard before? res available via cc?? > > Thanks everyone:) > > Bren
Message
Re: Lick of paint for Sidstation?
2005-04-26 by analogback
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.