are we positing that the review's quality is related to how favourable it is? sb: in what ways was the _sos_ review snobbish? unattributed sender: what weird things did it get poked for, then? On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:02:08PM -0400, sean brennan wrote: > I agree, the FM review was much better, the SOS feature came off a bit > snobby. > > > > it was OK. but he did take a couple pokes at it for weird things. > > the FM > > review was WAY more favorable; it got a platinum award and the review > > ended with them essentially saying "I can't live without this." and > > they > > liked it so much that they had a contest to win an SFX-6. > > > > so I guess I just meant that by comparison, it wasn't that great of a > > review. -- yours, niall. .. . . . . . . . . . aleph null. a simple insinuation around silence. http://syncretism.net .. .. gpg public key - http://www.aleph-null.net/niall.gpg .. ..
Message
Re: [elektron] Mono Review
2005-05-11 by niall munnelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.