Elektron Musical Instruments

> are we positing that the review's quality is related to how
> favourable it is?
Not my intention, overall it was an in depth review.

> : in what ways was the _sos_ review snobbish?
I felt that the Quasimidi polymorph gripe was a bit much and saying the 
cheesy 80's tune wasn't a good introduction wasn't needed.  I hate lots 
of presets on my gear and that's why i erase them all and spend a few 
months working on the studio-tan and sounddiving and would never let 
something like that influence my opinion of a piece of gear.
I think these machines are perfect regardless of extra noise or lack of 
triplets.
Besides, I'm with machinedrum, and he's good mates with mono, and if 
you got a problem with them then you got a problem with me!

s

>
> unattributed sender: what weird things did it get poked for,
> then?
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:02:08PM -0400, sean brennan wrote:
>> I agree, the FM review was much better, the SOS feature came off a bit
>> snobby.
>>
>>
>>> it was OK.  but he did take a couple pokes at it for weird things.
>>> the FM
>>> review was WAY more favorable; it got a platinum award and the review
>>> ended with them essentially saying "I can't live without this."  and
>>> they
>>> liked it so much that they had a contest to win an SFX-6.
>>>
>>> so I guess I just meant that by comparison, it wasn't that great of a
>>> review.
>
> -- 
> yours,
> niall.
> .. .  .   .    .     .       .           .             .               
>   .
> aleph null.                             a simple insinuation around 
> silence.
> http://syncretism.net
> .. .. gpg public key - http://www.aleph-null.net/niall.gpg .. ..
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>