And I am with you... I got your back yo!
-M
--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, sean brennan
<suburbanballistic@e...> wrote:
>
> > are we positing that the review's quality is related to how
> > favourable it is?
> Not my intention, overall it was an in depth review.
>
> > : in what ways was the _sos_ review snobbish?
> I felt that the Quasimidi polymorph gripe was a bit much and saying the
> cheesy 80's tune wasn't a good introduction wasn't needed. I hate lots
> of presets on my gear and that's why i erase them all and spend a few
> months working on the studio-tan and sounddiving and would never let
> something like that influence my opinion of a piece of gear.
> I think these machines are perfect regardless of extra noise or lack of
> triplets.
> Besides, I'm with machinedrum, and he's good mates with mono, and if
> you got a problem with them then you got a problem with me!
>
> s
>
> >
> > unattributed sender: what weird things did it get poked for,
> > then?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:02:08PM -0400, sean brennan wrote:
> >> I agree, the FM review was much better, the SOS feature came off
a bit
> >> snobby.
> >>
> >>
> >>> it was OK. but he did take a couple pokes at it for weird things.
> >>> the FM
> >>> review was WAY more favorable; it got a platinum award and the
review
> >>> ended with them essentially saying "I can't live without this." and
> >>> they
> >>> liked it so much that they had a contest to win an SFX-6.
> >>>
> >>> so I guess I just meant that by comparison, it wasn't that great
of a
> >>> review.
> >
> > --
> > yours,
> > niall.
> > .. . . . . . . . .
> > .
> > aleph null. a simple insinuation around
> > silence.
> > http://syncretism.net
> > .. .. gpg public key - http://www.aleph-null.net/niall.gpg .. ..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Message
Re: [elektron] Mono Review
2005-05-12 by finite_sf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.