I second you on that.... i was hopping for a new machine not an upgraded version.... elektron could have done better than... i'm sure the 64 steps can be done in the OS.... the shadow of the endless upgrade nightmare of the software companies has finally reached the hardware makers? Rui On 13 Nov 2007, at 15:17, Tarekith wrote: > I'm actually a little upset to be honest, since in the past Elektron > had said they would not release updated versions of their products. > That was one reason I didn't mind shelling out $1700 on a drum > machine, there was no chance it would be 'outdated' in couple years by > a newer model. Sure the originals are not useless or outdated, but I > think people know what I mean. > > At least the UW aspects were available as retrofits, I hope that it's > possible for the older SPS-1's can at least get the 64 step > sequencing... > > On 11/13/07, Robert Krueger <robert.krueger@...> wrote: >>> hmm...I am curious why they say these are 'new' products. They seem >>> more like hardware revisions with one added feature on each the MnM >>> and MD. I am surprised that they still offer a non-UW MD.. >>> >>> the MnM wave loading looks cool, depending on how its implemented >>> and >>> when it is - its not actually included yet. I dont ever trust >>> 'coming >>> soon' in a list of features... >>> >>> color me a little let down. >>> >>> Tony >>> >> >> >> >> True, I understand those sentiments. I was hoping for a brand new >> box, but >> I'll take the 64-step seq for now. I'm hoping that since the HW >> has been >> upgraded that we may be able to see more advanced features added >> in the near >> future via OS updates. >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Tarekith > http://tarekith.com > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [elektron] RE : Woot!!!
2007-11-13 by rui da silva