This is an interesting thread to me, because I'm thinking about putting together a live act, more towards industrial / experimental, but what is your opinion with this? Where can a group draw the line between prefab and live and still be okay? Does it depend on the kind of music? I'm not even sure where I stand. I saw Juno Reactor, with a lot of prerecorded material, but then there was the whole tribal core pounding out the beats on drum kits and African percussion. It made for a good live set, even if much of the music came from disc. On the other side, I saw Nitzer Ebb once do a horrible set, with just three guys standing around doing as little as possible, occasionally pushing "the big red button" to start the next song. But what can you do? If you tried to play everything live, some of the music just wouldn't come out right. Trying to recreate a sequence that's a repetition of sixteenth notes quantized exactly to the beat might be difficult. Sometimes you need that machinelike quality only a sequencer can give. Same with drum machines. Live drummers kick ass, but it's a totally different feel. I guess personally I like that hybridization of man and machine, that balance between preset and improv that makes music come alive. But then again it comes down to the kind of music involved...
Message
RE: [elektron] So-called live-acts
2002-03-06 by tonsil@sgi.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.