On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:07:06PM +0100, mizatch wrote:
> oh yeah, another thing i think the MD sorely lacks is slower lfo's....surely
wow, I guess there finally IS at least one other person
besides me who feels this way :) (hug) ((what??))
anyway, here's a trick I thought up that improves it for me:
what you do is use a 2nd LFO to modulate the speed of the first one---
if you use a really small depth, then you can make the LFO freq oscillate
b/t 0 and 1 and that makes it very slow, and also unsyncs it!
I love unsynced LFO's :)
Actually if you listen really closely, it's not really unsynced, but
syncing to a complex waveform that you don't pick up on as easily...
If you REALLY want a loose LFO sound, you have to do one of two things:
1) use a 3rd LFO to modulate the 2nd one that modulates the main one.
2) Or you can use a 3rd LFO and add its output and the 2nd LFO to
the first LFO's frequency.
also, if you make some meta-modulators TRIGgered and some FREE you
can get less predictable modulation, especially when you break
up your patterns in the seq. editor...
-N
--
DSP Audio Effects! http://gweep.net/~shifty
. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .
"La la la laaa laaa laaa " | Niente
La la la laaa laaa laaa." -Stereolab | shifty@...Message
Re: [elektron] Re: Machinedrum "could" be revolutionary.... almost
2002-10-17 by Crackpot
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.