hi i agree, with Earthman your better off with S&S and maybe some formant filters. I've used the Fs1r extensively and its difficult to see where your going from A to B. Whereas with samples at least you have a starting point. Also the Fs1r excels at silky choirs and ethereal voices rather than something that has a earthy human texture ----- Original Message ----- From: "I've got a LASER, Earthman!" <lepetitmartien@...> To: <elektron-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [elektron] Speak & Spells. le 13/07/2003 21:02, M-.-n \ufffd nostromo@... a \ufffdcrit : > > Speak & Spell's are just sample based. If you are talking about the speech > synthesis, I doubt the monomachine will be anywhere close. The regular beeps > of the S&S are themselves not too easy to produce (high tone + SSR + > distortion) but they're not too interesting either. It gets boring if you have only that, but to produce something in the same tones, you'd need formants (small band pass filters) loads of envelopesS You're better with an additive synth (soft or his majesty Kawai K5000) or maybe a FS1R. But it's easier with a bended S&S ;) Some bit reduction to squash the remains is good %) > Now the link you've sent is actually pointing to a 'bended' or modified > speak and spell... what those guy do is to connect parts of the IC that are > not meant to be connected and therefore fucks up the way it plays the voice > samples. Hence the kind of sound you hear.. but I doubt the monomachine will > sound like that at all, it is very particular to that machine. You can in the digital distort fashion, but the pure mutations of voices are out of reach for the reason addressed before And it's good to have impossibilities, you need to overcome them and try something NEW B) > M-.-n Hi you ;) Denis U] ================================================ lepetitmartien M.I.C. http://www.macmusic.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [elektron] Speak & Spells.
2003-07-13 by Raj