Yahoo Groups archive

Elektron Musical Instruments

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:22 UTC

Message

Re: [elektron] Speak & Spells.

2003-07-14 by endlessnessisticman

I would think, if you made it simple enough, you would only need a few
filters if you are taking a speech production route.  Maybe 4 or 5
points for vowel production in the forms of tubes.  Each would be
different sized filters of course.  Then an overall vocal tube size
parameter to determine things like female and male voice.  I would
assume it is more of a vowel producer than something that sings.  Or
else it's a different kind of vocoder.  I wouldn't think it would be a
sampler.  

It would be cool to be able to make those kind of double voiced monk
meditating sounds. 

--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "Raj" <rajah_patel@y...> wrote:
> one more thing...
> 
> this maybe the future
> 
> http://www.sospubs.co.uk/soundbank/1.asp#vocaloid
> 
> the Yamaha Vocaloid
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "I've got a LASER, Earthman!" <lepetitmartien@m...>
> To: <elektron-users@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [elektron] Speak & Spells.
> 
> 
> le 13/07/2003 21:02, M-.-n à nostromo@a... a écrit :
> 
> >
> > Speak & Spell's are just sample based. If you are talking about
the speech
> > synthesis, I doubt the monomachine will be anywhere close. The regular
> beeps
> > of the S&S are themselves not too easy to produce (high tone + SSR +
> > distortion) but they're not too interesting either.
> 
> It gets boring if you have only that, but to produce something in
the same
> tones, you'd need formants (small band pass filters) loads of envelopesS
> 
> You're better with an additive synth (soft or his majesty Kawai
K5000) or
> maybe a FS1R. But it's easier with a bended S&S ;)
> 
> Some bit reduction to squash the remains is good %)
> 
> > Now the link you've sent is actually pointing to a 'bended' or
modified
> > speak and spell... what those guy do is to connect parts of the IC
that
> are
> > not meant to be connected and therefore fucks up the way it plays the
> voice
> > samples. Hence the kind of sound you hear.. but I doubt the
monomachine
> will
> > sound like that at all, it is very particular to that machine.
> 
> You can in the digital distort fashion, but the pure mutations of
voices are
> out of reach for the reason addressed before
> 
> And it's good to have impossibilities, you need to overcome them and try
> something NEW B)
> 
> > M-.-n
> 
> Hi you ;)
> 
> Denis U]
> 
> ================================================
> lepetitmartien           M.I.C.                http://www.macmusic.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.