--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "Col Dee" <coldee@m...> wrote: > People keep talking about how good the Machinedrum's sequencer is, > and how the onboard effects give a distinctive sheen to its sounds. > > How does Fruityloops, the program, compare to the Machinedrum in > terms of usability, expressiveness and functions etc...? > > I ask because I use Fruityloops a lot and I'm wondering if there > would be any point in buying a Machinedrum. The sequencers in the MD and Fruity are different, but both have their advantages. The MD allows parameter locks etc which can liven up a basic pattern. Similar results can be achieved in fruity loops by automating the synths/samples, but this is much more of a hassle IMO. FruityLoops by itself cannot (not from the versions ive used anyway) synthesise its own drum sounds. You are limited to the samples you have, and your ability to manipulate them. On the other hand, the machinedrum allows deep programmability of sounds using actual synthesis (for the most part) and not just samples. In expressiveness (as far as sound results go), the MD is far superior to FL. I have used fruityloops in the past, and I currently own a MD. if I could choose between the two it would definately be the machinedrum. it also depends on your opinions on hardware and software and how you will be using them in relation to other gear etc. hope this has been of some help. - Joe (ps. i noticed theres another Joe in this group which has a MD - whoo!)
Message
Re: MACHINEDRUM vs FRUITYLOOPS
2003-09-04 by omnipresence_data
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.