I think it's a very interesting point you've made there about the MD being a great programmer but a poor arranger/editor (see original message below). I agree with you that the MD is not so conducive to "long-term" pattern evolution. This is what my friends always point out first when they test drive the MD. They feel like it's hard to visualize a song over longer time periods while editing at the same time. What they are used to doing is having their sequencer loop over 4, 8 or 16 bars on the computer, and simultaneously edit single bars within that long loop. With a computer it's possible to have 16 bars of information looping in front of you while you edit it at the same time. However, if you want 16 bars (or 4, or 8) looping on the MD you must be in song mode. And when in song mode, you can only edit the pattern that is currently playing and then it rolls the focus to the next pattern. (As opposed to editing just one pattern within the 16 bar loop and hearing it when the song position locator passes by.) I wonder if other people have found creative ways of working around this. I think this issue has a profound effect on the type of music we hear coming out of the MD and the MnM. Most of the demo tracks on this list tend to be quite "loopy" with a simplistic song development based on mutes: Dropping tracks in and out in 2/4/8 bar chunks. This is the traditional "techno" style of arrangement. That's why people were so impressed with tahvenaine2002 's demo track. The drum programming is bar-by-bar, each bar is unique but flows into the next bar logically. This is the kind of detailed drumandbass programming that Joe pointed out is more difficult to do on the MD because of it's "short-range" vision. One thing I thought of is perhaps working in pattern mode and using a computer sequencer to trig patterns. Then you could setup a loop of say 4 bars (or more) on the computer which triggers 4 different patterns on the MD. Then you just fiddle with each individual pattern on the MD while it's being trigged by the sequencer. Does that work? I guess I'll try it tonight. If you have any other ideas or interesting working styles on the MD please let us all know (esp. tahvenaine2002)! --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, Joe <jmelnyk@c...> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:30:43AM -0000, tahvenaine2002 wrote: > > Beat is all done in MD, just recorded it to stereotrack ot cubase, > > maybe added eq and compressor (can't remember), that's all. > > this makes the programming even more amazing, considering the fine-detail > within that song and the interface given. that is, the MD is wonderful > for pattern programming, but making things evolve over time and having > minute changes within the song sequencer is very time-consuming to > program. well done! > > Joe.
Message
Arranging and Editing on the Machinedrum
2004-01-16 by machinedrum99
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.