--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "cmp_trommelfell" <cosmosproductions@g...> wrote: > > 3.numero tres! , Is the MnM a good synthersizer (i know is a good > > sequencer!)does it compare to a nord lead or any other synths on > the > > market ,by compare i mean : can you tweek sounds and synths! hands > > on changing wave shapes , filtering , noise, etc .Because to me > they > > are marketing the Monomachine as an effects sequencer not a synth ! > I think that the expression 'effect-sequencer' fits better to the > possiblities of the MM. I haven't worked out up to now some PolyKits. > I am working with it as a 6track MonoSynth Pattern-sequencing tool. > But my impression is clear: It does not have the energy, the warmness > and the soul of an analogue Synth. I have had NL2 and NL3 (from my > point of view, the NL2 sounds better anyway) and I know that they > have far more possiblities (and qualities) for sounds.... but of > course, if you calculate the Sequencer of the MM with it, so I would > recommend the MM anyway. Tweaking is verry fun with MM I have heard from someone else also that the synthesis is limited, and that the sound isn't particularly good. I have been comtemplating the purchase of one of these (in addition to a Machinedrum), and I'm curious, since looking at the manual really doesn't give me a good idea of the feel of the machine...with the limitations that you speak of, how is the Machinedrum a better purchase than, say, a really good pattern based sequencer? Or, are you saying that, the integrated synthesizer is more than the sum of its parts? (I'm looking to be convinced). Thanks, Gene
Message
Re: Monomachine reviews ?questions etc!
2004-01-22 by droolmaster0
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.