Yahoo Groups archive

Elektron Musical Instruments

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:22 UTC

Message

Re: Monomachine reviews ?questions etc!

2004-01-22 by droolmaster0

--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "cmp_trommelfell" 
<cosmosproductions@g...> wrote:


> > 3.numero tres! , Is the MnM a good synthersizer (i know is a good 
> > sequencer!)does it compare to a nord lead or any other synths on 
> the 
> > market ,by compare i mean : can you tweek sounds and synths! 
hands 
> > on  changing wave shapes , filtering , noise, etc .Because to me 
> they 
> > are marketing the Monomachine as an effects sequencer not a 
synth !
> I think that the expression 'effect-sequencer' fits better to the 
> possiblities of the MM. I haven't worked out up to now some 
PolyKits. 
> I am working with it as a 6track MonoSynth Pattern-sequencing tool. 
> But my impression is clear: It does not have the energy, the 
warmness 
> and the soul of an analogue Synth. I have had NL2 and NL3 (from my 
> point of view, the NL2 sounds better anyway) and I know that they 
> have far more possiblities (and qualities) for sounds.... but of 
> course, if you calculate the Sequencer of the MM with it, so I 
would 
> recommend the MM anyway. Tweaking is verry fun with MM

I have heard from someone else also that the synthesis is limited, 
and that the sound isn't particularly good. I have been comtemplating 
the purchase of one of these (in addition to a Machinedrum), and I'm 
curious, since looking at the manual really doesn't give me a good 
idea of the feel of the machine...with the limitations that you speak 
of, how is the Machinedrum a better purchase than, say, a really good 
pattern based sequencer? Or, are you saying that, the integrated 
synthesizer is more than the sum of its parts? (I'm looking to be 
convinced).

Thanks,
Gene

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.