Elektron Musical Instruments

Of course if this is so, then that's OK. What we have here is a request to 
not close down options unless it really is unfeasable. If it can be done at 
an acceptable cost, many (most?) of us would like any improvements 
possible..

thinking happy thoughts
a

>i think what David wants to avoid is opening a giant can of worms.
>changing the OS like that would probably involve a drastic rewrite and 
>could introduce
>all kinds of new bugs along the way.
>
>Hans
>
>--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, not known <spectralab1@y...> wrote:
> > --- daniel_elektron <daniel@e...> wrote:
> > ---------------------------------
> > Probably technically possible, but I would prefer not
> > doing this.
> >
> > Daniel
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> > I guess I don't understand why not, when it is
> > something that would satsify both sides of the
> > argument, keeping both the folks who don't want their
> > current sounds to change *and* the folks who want new
> > features happy. seems like a fair compromise, no?
> >
> > I mean, if it's something that would be a lot of
> > trouble to do based on the current structure of the
> > code, or something like that, then I can understand.
> > but just saying "I don't feel like doing it" almost
> > makes it sound like you don't give a shit about the
> > suggestions of people who've already spent their money
> > on your products. not necessarily the best PR.
> >
> > cheers,
> > kevin
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>

_________________________________________________________________
Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband