Yahoo Groups archive

Elektron Musical Instruments

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:22 UTC

Message

Re: [elektron] 2 OS suggestion

2004-02-05 by Automatic Panic

I totaly agree with Daniel, if they did all of these
changes to the machinedrum then they might as well
sell it as a different unit. :) 

My only request is to have a couple of more machines
that could produce more electro noise for the
machinedrum. If this doesn't happen that's ok cause I
still have some other toys to do this with :) 


--- daniel_elektron <daniel@...> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm... We want to supply our products and make
> things better if we 
> have good ideas, and can do it without other stuff
> suffering. We are 
> not so many people, and we need to spend our time
> also making new 
> products in order to survive.
> 
> And don't expect it is possible to do something in
> the Machinedrum, 
> just because we made it on the Monomachine. The
> Machinedrum has 12 
> more tracks, and thus less cycles to spend per
> track. The signal 
> flow is also highly optimised for each unit, so it's
> not just copy-
> paste. 
> 
> But it's interesting to hear all the wishes. Just
> compile them and 
> get them to us, and we'll take the decision what to
> do. Some might 
> make it into the Machinedrum, and some might
> influence how we think 
> for future products.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Ivan
> Sharma" 
> <noision1@h...> wrote:
> > then you have to ask the question: just because it
> something may be
> > technically possible, why should Elektron do it
> (for free)?
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Rui Peixoto" <rupix@h...>
> > To: <elektron-users@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:21 AM
> > Subject: [elektron] 2 OS suggestion
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi there!
> > > I don\ufffdt know why the 2 OS suggestion seemed to
> freak so many of 
> you out
> > > there. I mean I\ufffdd understand if someone from
> elektron showed up 
> saying
> > that
> > > it is not possible due to technical reasons of
> some sort, and 
> for sure we
> > > had to respect them. But I just can\ufffdt understand
> you guys. I 
> mean, I
> > clearly
> > > respect your ideas of wanting to keep the MD as
> it is atm, and 
> keep your
> > > kits and such, BUT you should also try to
> respect and understand 
> those
> > that
> > > would like to see some changes in the sound,
> specially if they 
> are
> > > relatively easy to implement. The 2 OS
> suggestion is really 
> because of you
> > > guys feeling intimidated by an extra "switch"
> knob somewhere in 
> a hidden
> > > menu. It\ufffdd also save memory. You guys could
> choose which one to 
> d/l and
> > > install. But so could we.
> > > Sorry for the rant but it all comes down to not
> tolerate 
> intolerance.
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.