On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:37:14PM -0000, pixfodase wrote: > but it could be set that way. decay=1 would be the first value in > which the note was triggered and you\ufffdd only listen to the attack > portion like you said, but when decay=0 then the note wasn\ufffdt > triggered at all, allowing the previous note to decay normally, and > so you could make your parameter changes in the between steps. ahhh...I see: you're proposing such a change in the OS, not suggesting simply a new way of programming a pattern. yes, this could be one way of implementing such a change. > Maybe I didn\ufffdt get your point. Am I missing something? I mean, we > wouldn\ufffdt lose any functionality this way...at least none that I can > think of. no, just 1/128th of the decay value! I'm sure you'll hear a drastic difference between a minimum of 0 and 1! ;-) > If this could be implemented it\ufffdd be really really cool. I agree. this is probably my most longed-for feature in the MD. Joe
Message
Re: [elektron] Re: [MD FEATURE REQUEST AND BUGS LIST V6]
2004-02-06 by Joe
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.